How can the World Golf Hall of Fame snub a legend like three-time major champion and European Ryder Cup captain Padraig Harrington?
- Four inductees were chosen from a shortlist of 10 by the 20-strong committee
- Three have been revealed so far – Tiger Woods, Marion Hollins and Tim Finchem
- Fourth will be revealed on Wednesday but it will not be the name of Harrington
Goodness, you are loath to argue with a 20-strong selection committee containing players who can put as many medals on the table as Nick Price, Curtis Strange and Annika Sorenstam.
Not to mention CEOs of organisations as august as the PGA and European Tours, the USGA and the R&A. But let’s have a try, shall we? They have surely got it grievously wrong in snubbing Padraig Harrington when it comes to the inductees for the 2021 class of the World Golf Hall of Fame.
Yes, Padraig Harrington; the South of Ireland’s greatest ever golfer, a three-time major champion and the current European Ryder Cup captain. How on earth can he not be inducted at the earliest possible opportunity?
World Golf Hall of Fame have surely got it grievously wrong in snubbing Padraig Harrington
The names of the four inductees chosen from a shortlist of 10 are being announced singly, with the last of the four named on Wednesday.
So far, they have announced Tiger Woods — I think we can all agree on that one — Marion Hollins, a pioneer of the women’s game, and former PGA Tour CEO Tim Finchem. While it would be wrong to reveal the name of the final selection ahead of the official release, it is hopefully not breaching protocol in revealing who it is not: the Irishman.
I should declare an interest at this point. I was part of the nominating committee who put forward 48-year-old Harrington’s name (one of the criteria was changed this time, with the age of eligibility lowered from 50 to 45).
Harrington kisses the trophy after winning The Open Championship at Carnoustie in 2007
I have also been part of the final selection committee, so I am aware of the horse-trading that goes on before the inductees in this biennial process are finally chosen.
In 2017, I was pleased to play a part in getting Ian Woosnam an induction that was scandalously overdue. And yes, I get why you would want to recognise Hollins and Finchem.
The former was an influential voice in golf architecture and the amateur game in the 1920s, and the latter harnessed the power of the PGA Tour to make it the most powerful organisation in the game.
But is that why people go to visit golf ’s Hall of Fame, situated just outside Jacksonville in Florida; to read about architects and administrators?
Or would they rather learn about the stirring deeds of its legendary players?
In this induction cycle, we have two golfers and two from the contributors category, which strikes me as a skewed sense of priorities. It should almost wholly be about the players, and particularly when you have the chance to recognise a man who has won two Opens, a USPGA and played in no fewer than four winning Ryder Cup teams. That is not the only thing wrong with this list. It is also allAmerican.
Nothing wrong with that, of course, if the four most just cases are, indeed, American.
But if you’re trying to convince the world outside America that you really are a World Golf Hall of Fame, leaving off Harrington when he plainly should be one of the four is not the way to go about it. Led by Tiger and Padraig, this should have been a quartet of inductees to stir wider recognition and interest in the Hall of Fame. Instead, outside America, it will do more harm than good