RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: The Krays would blush at Stop Funding Hate!

Two goons in dark suits walk into an East End boozer, followed by a man with a Crombie draped over his shoulders. They ask the terrified barman to fetch the landlord.

Drinkers fall silent. Some head for the door.

‘Nice little place you’ve got here,’ Crombie tells Mine Host. ‘Wouldn’t want anything happening to it.’ He then explains that for a small consideration, the pub can be insured against any unwelcome mishap — criminal damage, fires, that sort of thing.

Call it a monkey a week for cash. Razors will be around on Friday to collect the first instalment. That way nobody gets hurt.

This offer-you-can’t-refuse was the stock-in-trade of gangsters like the Krays in the 1960s.

Today’s social justice warriors will be horrified when I compare them to Ron and Reg. But their tactics are basically the same.

Outfits like Stop Funding Hate and Stonewall are running what are effectively protection rackets. Do as we say, or else.

The Twins used physical intimidation. The wokerati deploy more subtle, but equally menacing, ideological intimidation. Instead of pubs and nightclubs, the targets today are giant corporations and public institutions.

Take Stonewall, a once admirable lobby group which has achieved its principal aim of equality under the law for homosexuals.

I’m not going to get involved in their internal squabbles, which have been comprehensively aired by prominent gay rights pioneers such as Simon Fanshawe writing in the Mail.

But with the big battles won, instead of declaring victory and disbanding, Stonewall has expanded its ambitions. These days it makes a fortune selling ‘advice’ to everyone from banks and financial institutions to the police, the Armed Forces, schools, colleges and government departments.

Get with the programme and, in exchange for an annual bung starting at £2,500, Stonewall will reward you with LGBT-friendly ‘Diversity Champion’ status — the woke equivalent of a Blue Peter badge.

The flip side is those who refuse to take part are, by implication, at risk of being labelled homophobic and transphobic.

And we wouldn’t want that now, would we? It’s cheaper to pay up than suffer reputational damage.

The scheme has proved to be a nice little earner for Stonewall, which has been pulling in more than £3 million a year. But not for much longer. This lucrative racket has been rumbled. Even the Equality and Human Rights Commission has decided enough is enough.

Stop Funding Hate is a more sinister proposition altogether. It uses technological intimidation to shut down free speech.

The latest target of this bunch of far-Left headbangers is Andrew Neil’s newly launched GB News TV station, which was accused of peddling ‘hate’ even before it went on air. SFH has been stoking up a tedious Twitterstorm to bully advertisers into boycotting the station. Their message is clear: advertise with GB News and we will destroy you.

Shamefully, a number of leading corporations, including Ikea, Nivea and Grolsch, have capitulated, issuing statements parroting fashionable nostrums about ‘inclusivity’ and vowing never to advertise on GB News again.

Hilariously, their pious stances have backfired, simply drawing attention to some of their own dubious corporate ‘values’ — such as Ikea spying on their own workers and Nivea flogging skin-lightening creams to black Africans.

You couldn’t make it up.

That’s almost beside the point, though. The question isn’t just why these spineless corporations cave in so cravenly, like a frightened publican paying off the Krays. What makes them think their traditional customers will take any notice of a bunch of social justice warriors bashing away on a laptop above a kebab shop in Stoke Newington? It’s just as likely to have the opposite effect.

Why are they appeasing revolutionaries who want to smash the free market system from which they derive their profits?

Here’s another analogy. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, when I was an industrial correspondent, secondary picketing was commonplace. This was the practice of shutting down a supplier to put pressure on an employer with whom the unions were in dispute. It was outlawed by Mrs Thatcher. Why should blameless third-parties suffer collateral damage?

Yet isn’t that exactly what’s going on here? Stop Funding Hate’s threats to disrupt companies who advertise with broadcasters and publications of which it disapproves is secondary picketing by another name.

If they mass picketed Ikea stores, trying physically to turn customers away, they’d soon be staring down the barrel of an injunction, as a basis for negotiation.

I was going to say they’d be moved on by police, but these days the Old Bill would probably join them, given their approach to BLM and Extinction Rebellion.

But in reality, there aren’t anywhere near enough of them to blockade every Ikea store in the country. So they hide behind the anonymous shield of social media, which exaggerates their strength out of all proportion.

When will it finally dawn on these gormless corporations that Twitter isn’t the real world?

This madness will only end when the rest of us fight fire with fire. Some Tory MPs are now proposing a consumer boycott of companies which give in to Stop Funding Hate.

Sounds like a plan to me. I’ve already put my money where my mouth is and kept my promise not to renew my two season tickets at Spurs in protest at the ‘taking the knee’ nonsense.

No more Nivea Men aftershave, either. Boycotting Ikea won’t be a problem. I only ever went there once, and it was hell on earth. And, anyway, my wife has banned me from attempting to build self-assembly furniture.

As Squeeze almost sang, it’s the language she don’t need.

But if Stonewall can be stopped, so can Stop Funding Hate. If enough of us take our custom elsewhere, these cowardly corporations will soon get the message:

Nice little business you’ve got here. Wouldn’t want anything happening to it . . .