The devastating coronavirus crisis that has ripped across the world this year has fulled the rise of the phrase ‘the new normal’ as people adapted to a different way of living.
But as the wave of the pandemic rolled from the Far East to the West it also catalysed a surge in more abnormal thinking and behaviour.
As early as January conspiracy theorists made unsubstantiated claims the virus was caused or helped by 5G masts, which were being built to support the new wireless technology that quickens internet speed.
Thugs attacked mobile phone towers in the UK, Europe, the US and other parts of the world over fears they were hampering their health.
Meanwhile only last week a bomber attacked an AT&T building in Nashville in the US on Christmas Day, possibly spurred on by his belief 5G cellular technology was killing people.
Yet throughout the year concerns have been constantly addressed as expert after expert came out assuring them the coronavirus pandemic had no links to the roll out of 5G.
Groups such as The Action Against mobile group were joined by well-known conspiracy theorists such as former footballer David Icke (pictured) and former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s brother Piers during the pandemic
As the wave of the pandemic rolled from the Far East to the West it also catalysed a surge in more abnormal thinking and behaviour
Conspiracy theories have run rampant on social media sites such as Facebook (pictured) during the pandemic
Conspiracy theories over mobile networks have a long history, with protesters regularly ripping down 3G base stations near schools and homes back in the early 1990s.
In those days people feared the masts were a cancer risk and whether there was enough testing conducted – claims also hurled against WiFi as it was unveiled around the same time.
Even before Covid-19 emerged in December last year large swathes of people were already fearful of the health dangers posed by the installation of 5G.
One of the first targeted attacks on a mast came in 2018 when a man scaled a lamppost to tear down what he thought was a 5G antenna in Gateshead.
Later, in May last year, a picture of a man wearing a hazmat radiation suit – supposedly to install a deadly 5G tower in the US – was thought to actually be a cleaner or painter sprucing up the mast and covered up due to bird droppings or liquid splash back.
And just before the coronavirus struck, in December 2019, conspiracy theories went rampant online after images of hundreds of dead starlings were shared on a road in North Wales.
So it is perhaps unsurprising that conspiracy theorists leapt on the coronavirus pandemic to peddle yet more negative claims about 5G.
These started to emerge in public and private social media groups as early as January – two months before the UK went into its first lockdown – as users shared ideas that 5G was weakening people for Covid-19 to capitalise on.
But since then theories have varied wildly, including that the disease is caused by 5G and the virus is a myth, the pandemic is a hoax so the government can install 5G as well as spurious notions about Microsoft founder Bill Gates such as that he started the ‘plandemic’ to control people.
Some even suggest Covid broke out in Wuhan in China due to the early presence of 5G masts there.
Dr Joseph Downing, a fellow in nationalism at the London School of Economic, explains: ‘These conspiracy theories rely on a grain of truth or a grain of fact which is then extrapolated forward into something that’s ludicrous.’
As lockdowns were introduce globally and people’s personal freedoms were reduced, the extremity of the claims appeared to ratchet up.
Online whispers turned to violence as people attacked towers, with 10 European countries seeing masts torched as well as numerous cases of maintenance workers being assaulted.
Meanwhile only last week a bomber called Anthony Quinn Warner attacked an AT&T building in Nashville in the US on Christmas Day, possibly spurred on by his belief 5G cellular technology was killing people.
Warner, 63, was named by the FBI on Sunday as perpetrator of the Christmas Day bombing outside an AT&T building, after DNA showed he perished in the attack carried out with an RV
Such was the severity of the 5G conspiracy issue, an IPSOS study found 10 per cent of interviewees held a negative opinion towards the technology.
The research also tested some myths and found while a small minority believes in them, a substantial amount of Europeans are not sure they are false either.
The myths around 5G appear to have been spread mostly through social media pages, with giants such as Facebook, YouTube and Whatsapp cracking down on misinformation as the pandemic went on.
But groups such as The Action Against mobile group were joined by well-known conspiracy theorists such as former footballer David Icke and former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s brother Piers.
There have been high profile rallies in the UK – with social distancing rules ignored – where these figures have tried to spread their misinformation to crowds sometimes numbering hundreds.
But in truth, there is no evidence to suggest the coronavirus is caused by 5G in any way.
The outbreak started with a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown origin in Wuhan, which Chinese authorities reported to the World Health Organization on December 31 last year.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says on its website many of the early patients had links to a seafood and live animal market where a human might have contracted the virus from an animal. The virus then spread person-to-person.
The symptoms of Covid-19 include fever, tiredness, cough, and shortness of breath that can appear two to 14 days after being exposed to the virus.
The coronavirus is spread through respiratory droplets, for example in coughs and sneezes. Claims that 5G networks, not Covid-19, are making people ill, are false.
Meanwhile mobile phone technology such as 5G uses radio waves, the lowest-energy form of radiation on the electromagnetic spectrum.
As already explained, Covid-19 is not spread by radiation but by a virus that is passed via droplets from person to person. Many countries affected by coronavirus do not yet have 5G coverage.
As for the bizarre claims Bill Gates is trying to control the world with the so-called ‘plandemic’, they are also incorrect.
Some misinformation related to the tech pioneer and the pandemic includes false claims about population control.
Some of these stem from a misinterpretation of a section of a speech he gave at a TED conference in 2010.
As part of a talk on reducing CO2 emissions to zero, he said: ‘First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion.
‘Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 per cent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.’
Another conspiracy theory falsely accuses Gates and his foundation of assisting in the design of a coronavirus.
This theory stems from a misinterpretation of the work done by a research centre in England called the Pirbright Institute funded by The Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation, which has also been debunked.
While it may be easy for many people to laugh off conspiracies surrounding 5G and its alleged links to the virus, experts warn they still pose a threat.
Dr Wasim Ahmed, a lecturer in digital business at Newcastle University who has written widely on the subject, says examples started to die off as the pandemic went on.
But he also noted the threat to public health these groups and individuals pose due to an undermining of governments and scientific bodies.
He tells MailOnline: ‘Although not as popular as it was earlier in the year, the conspiracy is still around today.
Theories have varied wildly, including that the disease is caused by 5G and the virus is a myth, the pandemic is a hoax so the government can install 5G as well as spurious notions about Microsoft founder Bill Gates such as that he started the ‘plandemic’ to control people
The bizarre claims Bill Gates is trying to control the world with the so-called ‘plandemic’ are incorrect
‘Conspiracies such as this pose a threat to public health because research has found that those who believe in conspiracies are less likely to follow government advice around Covid-19 safety measures.
‘There are 5G towers that are still being vandalised around the world and some have linked this to this conspiracy.’
Yet stamping out these people’s opinions and silencing them online is not the right approach, Dr Downing from LSE, says.
He tells MailOnline the believers feed off a persecution complex, something also seen in terrorists, where they feel they hold the truth and are being unjustly silenced by the mainstream.
Dr Downing says: ‘Theories are spread through person to person networks – as well as on sites – which is very difficult to monitor and very difficult to understand really what is being passed around.
‘It’s a huge issue. But it still remains to be seen how we can combat it because the real information is out there.’
He continues: ‘For those people that are in that mindset, it’s really really difficult to reach them because anything you can supply them with, they will just say it’s fake. Whereas anything they can see which suits their beliefs which is fake, they will tell you it’s true.
‘You get into that weird space where empirical evidence becomes irrelevant, it just becomes about I believe this and you believe that.’
On whether there is a way to stem the spread of their misinformation, Dr Downing says no.
‘There isn’t a simple answer’, he adds. ‘But I do think that it’s deplatforming these things and not having a public discussion about them is ever more harmful. One thing these people do thrive on and one of their key justification sis the persecution complex.
‘This is shared in 5G conspiracy theorists, Covid conspiracy, right wing groups, Islamic extremists, it covers the entire spectrum. They all rely on this persecution complex to say that ”we’re the bearers of truth” being persecuted by the malevolent mainstream.
‘The more its ridiculed, pushed to the margins, the more deplatforms, it raises serious issues around free speech, but it also provides them with a greater degree of validation.’
He adds: ‘I think with these kinds of conspiracies, let it be said, do good public information programmes that provide genuine, well researched cited information, but try not to adopt that kind of combative approach from a policy perspective because it only strengthens their position.’